News

IAMSE Spring 2023 Session 2 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Tracey A.H. Taylor, Ph.D. and Andrea Belovich, Ph.D.]

Lessons Learned in Developing Accelerated 3-Year MD Programs

In the second session of the series, three experts from the Consortium of Accelerated Medical Pathway Programs (CAMPP) spoke of “Lessons Learned in Developing Accelerated 3-Year MD Programs”. Dr. Joan Cangiarella, M.D. of the NYU Grossman School of Medicine began the session by defining an accelerated medical pathway program as a program that confers the MD degree in less than four years. She said that three-year programs are common in Canadian medical schools and that the first modern program in the United States started in 2010 at Texas Tech University. Interest in these programs is growing, as the group published survey data in 2016 and found that 35% of medical schools (n=127) said they were considering the development of an accelerated pathway program (Cangiarella et al. Med Educ Online, 2016). The general structures of these programs contain a standard MS1 and MS2 year that includes a summer of education in order to meet the LCME (Liaison Committee on Medical Education) accreditation 130-week requirement. The MS3 and MS4 years are usually condensed. Most programs have a directed pathway to an affiliated residency program, but this is not a requirement.

The biggest mission of 3-year accelerated programs is debt reduction where students save a year of tuition and enter the work force one year earlier, to save an estimated $250,000.00. Missions of other programs include serving underserved communities, or focusing on primary care and family medicine. Dr. Cangiarella also described the programs in the CAMPP, which was initiated from a Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation grant in 2014, and include the original seven programs from 2015 (NYU, UC-Davis, Penn State, University of Louisville, MCW-Green Bay Central, Mercer, and McMaster). There has been continued growth every year with new programs joining each year since 2015. One of the core goals of the formation of this group was to identify and disseminate best-practices in the formation of an accelerated pathway program in medical education, addressing diversity, logistical, regulatory, professional development, and competency concerns.

Following this introduction to 3-year accelerated programs, Dr. Cagiarella spoke more specifically about the NYU Grossman accelerated 3-year MD (3YMD) pathway. Developed as part of a major curriculum revision in 2010 that included numerous pathways. The goals were to provide individualized choice, reduce debt, and improve the UME-GME continuum. The medical school is now tuition-free and this was the first step on that path. NYU Grossman was the first medical school in the US to offer a 3YMD pathway to a select group of students with a directed pathway to one of 21 NYU-Langone Medical Center residency programs at the time of admission. This program is highly competitive and was offered as part of the regular admissions process. Students needed to know which specialty they wanted to pursue upon admission, and still participate in the NRMP to be accepted into the residency program following UME graduation after 3 years. The school currently has 40 residency spots available to this program, and the number of slots per specialty is known upon admission. There are various portals of entry to the program: pre-matriculation, during the 4-year MD program (end of year 1 or end of year 2), or through the MD-PhD program. Currently, the 3YMD program is 18 weeks shorter than the traditional four-year pathway at NYU Grossman, and contains a mentoring portion. Between 2013 and 2022, there have been 198 students accepted into the program, representing all residencies available. Of those, 138 have graduated and 43 are current students. A further seventeen students decelerated (either chosen or counseled to do so) and 12 switched specialties. The students overall perform very similarly to their four-year peers with the only differences being performance on step 1 and step 2 (J Graduate Medical Education, February 2022). The program has been so successful that the school has undergone a recent curriculum redesign to expand the 3YMD pathway.

Dr. Catherine Coe, M.D. of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill next discussed the FIRST (fully integrated readiness for service training) program. She started by stating “if you’ve seen one 3-year pathway program, you’ve seen one-3-year pathway program”, and then went on to describe the program at the University of North Carolina. A goal of the program was to increase the physician workforce in the state by reducing barriers and educating students at both the UME and GME level, through an accelerated and enhanced 3-year medical school curriculum. Following 3 year of medical school and residency, graduating physicians complete 3 years of service in a rural and/or underserved area within the state of North Carolina. The program began in 2018 and now offers residency options in Family Medicine, General Surgery, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry at all four of the regional sites. The program reduces barriers and harmonizes the transitions from UME to GME to medical practice. The curriculum consists of an 18-month foundation phase curriculum, followed by a 12-month clinical phase, and 12-16 months of individualization or elective time. Students spend one half day per week in the clinic of their chosen specialty starting at the first week of medical school. Summer between the first and second year contains 8-weeks of the clinical phase. In terms of outcomes to date, there have been 37 students matriculate with 19 total graduates. Six students chose to decelerate and three students changed specialties. All graduates perform similarly to graduates of the 4-year program in nearly all metrics, with the exception of slightly lower step 1 scores.

Dr. Gladys Ayala, M.D., Dean of the NYU Long Island School of Medicine next spoke of the exclusively 3-year medical school program at her institution. This program was developed following the success of the 3-year program described by Dr. Cagiarella. The primary aim is to
train physician leaders who are committed to practice in specific primary care disciplines and address the physician work-force shortages in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics & gynecology, and general surgery. Like the other programs described, the three-year accelerated curriculum is followed by a pre-chosen residency program, thereby reducing barriers in the UME to GME transition. The curriculum uses problem-based learning as the core teaching modality, and offers tuition-free scholarships to all students, and a debt-free scholarship to those with the greatest need. The program includes a robust coaching (academic and professional development), diversity mentoring, and specialty advising system. The programs is committed and focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion with a student-run clinic, a pipeline program, and service learning projects. The class-size is small with 24 students and a future maximum size of 40 students. In terms of outcomes, 20 students have graduated (one class) with 90% of students staying in primary care specialties.

Lastly, Dr. Coe summarized the discussion by listing benefits of accelerated 3-year MD pathways as including accelerated and individualized entry to desired specialty, being valuable to those with advanced degrees and career interests, including reduced debt and earlier career earnings, facilitated continuum of training from UME through GME, and including intensive mentorship that begins in the first year. The CAMPP has published a roadmap for creating an accelerated 3-year program (Med Educ Online 2017). Dr. Coe described the consortium and the many benefits of CAMPP, including some of the manuscripts that have been published from the group (Cangiarella et al. 2017 Acad Med; Leong et al. 2017 Med Educ Online; Modrek et al. 2021, Acad Med; Cangiarella et al. 2020 Acad Med), and positive outcomes from these programs in terms of preparedness, student satisfaction, wellness, and reduced debt. These programs provide individualized curricula with close mentorship and support. The webinar closed by sharing an invitation to join CAMPP as a way to collaborate, network, and share best practices (www.acceleratedmdpathways.org).

References
• Cangiarella J, Gillespie C, O’Shea J, Morrison G, Abramson SB. Accelerating medical education: a survey of deans and program directors. Med Educ Online 2016;21:31794.
• Cangiarella J, K Eliasz, A Kalet, E Cohen, S Abramson, C Gillespie. A Preliminary Evaluation of Students’ Learning and Performance Outcomes in an Accelerated 3-Year MD Pathway Program. J Grad Med Educ 1 February 2022; 14 (1): 99–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-00284.1
• Leong SL, J Cangiarella, T Fancher, L Dodson, C Grochowski, V Harnik, C Hustedde, B Jones, C Kelly, A Macerollo, AC Reboli, M Rosenfeld, K Rundell, T Thompson, R Whyte & M Pusic (2017) Roadmap for creating an accelerated three-year medical education program, Medical Education Online, 22:1, DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1396172
• Cangiarella, J; Fancher, T; Jones, B; Dodson, L; Leong, SL; Hunsaker, M; Pallay, R; Whyte, R; Holthouser, A; Abramson, SB. Three-Year MD Programs: Perspectives From the Consortium of Accelerated Medical Pathway Programs (CAMPP). Academic Medicine 92(4):p 483-490, April 2017. | DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001465
• Cangiarella, J; Cohen, E; Rivera, R; Gillespie, C; Abramson, S. Evolution of an Accelerated 3-Year Pathway to the MD Degree: The Experience of New York University Grossman School of Medicine. Academic Medicine 95(4):p 534-539, April 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003013
• Modrek, AS; Tanese, N; Placantonakis, DG; Sulman, EP; Rivera, R; Du, KL; Gerber, NK; David, G; Chesler, M; Philips, MR; Cangiarella, J. Breaking Tradition to Bridge Bench and Bedside: Accelerating the MD-PhD-Residency Pathway. Academic Medicine 96(4):p 518-521, April 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003920

#IAMSE23 Faculty Development Session Spotlight: How to get published in Medical Science Educator

The 27th Annual IAMSE Meeting will feature a host of new sessions throughout the entire conference. One of our pre-conference courses is How to get published in Medical Science Educator. This half-day faculty development course will be given on Saturday, June 10th and will be led by Peter de Jong, current Editor-in-Chief of Medical Science Educator (the Netherlands). 

How to get published in Medical Science Educator
Presenter:
Peter de Jong – Medical Science Educator Editor-in-Chief
Date and Time: Saturday, June 10, 2023, 8:30 AM – 11:30 AM

This workshop has been developed to support authors preparing their manuscripts for submission to Medical Science Educator. In the workshop editors of the journal will discuss the scope of the journal, the manuscript types available, the importance of the cover letter, as well as strategies to make your submission as strong as possible. Several examples of published articles will be shown. The workshop will be conducted face-to-face at the IAMSE Annual Meeting and will use a small group active discussion format. Participants will be provided with a homework assignment prior to the workshop.

For more information on half-day faculty development sessions, and to register for the 27th Annual IAMSE Meeting, please visit www.IAMSEconference.org.

Say hello to our featured member
Brandi McCleskey!

Our association is a robust and diverse set of educators, students, researchers, medical professionals, volunteers and academics that come from all walks of life and from around the globe. Each month we choose a member to highlight their academic and professional career and see how they are making the best of their membership in IAMSE. This month’s Featured Member is Brandi McCleskey.

Brandi McCleskey, MD
Associate Professor
University of Alabama at Birmingham (USA)

How long have you been a member of IAMSE?
I became a member in 2022 prior to presenting a workshop at GRIPE at IAMSE during the 2022 Annual Conference. 

Looking at your time with the Association, what have you most enjoyed doing? What are you looking forward to? How does IAMSE benefit pathology educators? 
Last year’s conference was my first introduction to IAMSE and I’m looking forward to learning more about the Association as well as engaging with the presentations this year during the Annual Conference. I’ve enjoyed the (#IAMSECafe) sessions offered leading up to the Annual Conference as well. IAMSE focuses on a wide variety of pedagogical topics that are widely applicable to all disciplines including Pathology education. IAMSE can also offer Pathology educators a platform to connect with other educators and highlight the importance of a quality Pathology curriculum.  

I am looking forward to meeting some of our colleagues whom I have only met online. During the pandemic, we started to collaborate by leveraging technology, but now that the travel conditions have allowed it, I am looking forward to being able to see them in real life.

Tell us about the GRIPE at IAMSE program during the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference. Why should people – including non-pathologists – attend? What part of your program are you most excited about?
This year’s program will focus on the Practice of Pathology Education. The featured plenary speaker is one of the founding members of GRIPE and will help us understand the history of Pathology education and the trajectory that brought us where we are today. I’m most excited about the panel with “learners” – both students and trainees – who can give feedback to us as educators regarding their experiences with Pathology education. It will be a valuable program for all (specifically non-pathologists) as we’ll close the day with a focus on teaching Pathology as a non-pathologist. 

What event are you most looking forward to in Cancun?
I’m excited to hear the Plenary session by Professor Anique de Bruin who I hope will remind us that “we can do hard things” and how to help our learners understand that some degree of “desirable difficulty” is necessary for success. 

What interesting things are you working on outside the Association right now?
I am a Forensic Pathologist and am currently working with the National Association of Medical Examiner’s to help remediate our workforce shortage which includes building a passion for Pathology as a career in medical students, undergraduates, and beyond. I am also a Pathology Residency Program Director and work endlessly to ensure our trainees are not just successful doctors and Pathologists, but also focus on their well-being as individuals and part of a team (whether that be at work, at home, or in the community). 

Anything else that you would like to add?
I would love to see everyone at the GRIPE at IAMSE Program this year during the Annual Conference. I’d also love to connect with you in Cancun or on social media (@bcmmd12 on Twitter and you can find me on LinkedIn). 


Want to learn more about the GRIPE at IAMSE program during the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference? Click here for more information on that program and the hundreds of other presentations happening live in June in Cancun, Mexico!

Bray and Linsenmeyer to Present “Fostering Community Through Rural Pipelines and Pathways”

Sometimes you just need to add more lanes to the highway. The IAMSE Webinar Committee is excited to announce our Spring series, Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations. This series will explore innovative practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities. The third session in the series will feature Natasha Bray of the Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine (USA) and Machelle Linsenmeyer of the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (USA).

Fostering Community Through Rural Pipelines and Pathways

Presenters: Natasha Bray, DO, MSEd, FACOI, FACP, FNAOME and Machelle Linsenmeyer, EdD
Session Date & Time: March 16, 2023 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: Rural pipelines and pathways can take many different forms. It might be to enhance the scope and breadth of physicians serving in rural/underserved primary care areas, it might be to allow exposure to the surrounding cultures, or to develop a cultural identity, community and pride in various backgrounds, histories, values, and so on. Whatever the goal (or maybe it is all), the bonds formed in these activities can strengthen both students and communities. Medical Schools have been developing rural pipelines and pathways for many years. In this session, we will hear from two institutions regarding efforts to increase awareness in rural/underserved/tribal communities.

There is still time to register yourself or your institution for the series. Is your institution already registered? Reach out to your administrative contact to get signed up for weekly updates.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

Please email support@iamse.org for more details about student registration.

Submit Manuscripts for the MSE 2023 Special Topic: Students as Future Educators

In 2023, Medical Science Educator, the journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE), will be publishing a special journal section dedicated to the topic of:

Health Science Students as Future Educators:
How to Support and Encourage Them

In this section, the journal would like to explore initiatives from around the world to motivate their students to become future educators.

During their careers as physicians or biomedical science researchers, many will at some point in time get involved in teaching health sciences students. Still, most students graduate without formal training in education. In some schools students can voluntarily get involved in educational activities such as peer teaching, educational committees, and education projects, while in other places mandatory student-as-teacher programs are being offered to teach students the principles of classroom and small-group teaching techniques, and to introduce them to health sciences education scholarship. 

The Editorial Board of Medical Science Educator is currently soliciting article submissions to inform the readership about initiatives to support and encourage students to develop as educators. See our website www.medicalscienceeducator.org for a more detailed description of these article types. All submissions will be peer-reviewed in our regular review process. Accepted manuscripts will be clustered together into a special section in issue 33(6), or will be published in one of the regular issues afterwards.

Manuscripts to be considered for these sections must be submitted by May 1st, 2023 through our online submission system at www.medicalscienceeducator.org. In your cover letter, please refer to the topic “Students as Future Educators” to indicate that you would like to be included in the special section. See our journal website for the Instructions for Authors.

We look forward to receiving your submissions.

Cangiarella and Coe to Present “Developing Accelerated 3-Year MD Programs”

Sometimes you just need to add more lanes to the highway. The IAMSE Webinar Committee is excited to announce our Spring series, Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations. This series will explore innovative practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities. The second session in the series will feature Joan Cangiarella of the New York University Grossman School of Medicine (USA) and Catherine Coe of the University of North Carolina (USA).

Lessons Learned in Developing Accelerated 3-Year MD Programs

Presenters: Joan Cangiarella, MD and Catherine Coe, MD
Session Date & Time: March 9, 2023 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: In 2015, the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation funded 8 medical schools with accelerated three-year MD programs to form the Consortium of Accelerated Medical Pathway Programs (CAMPP). The mission of CAMPP is to understand the logistical, financial, regulatory and competency concerns related to the formation of such programs. The Consortium now includes approximately 30 member schools that have produced a critical mass of graduates—learners who have transitioned to residency and to practice suggesting continued wide interest in expansion of these programs. Criticisms surrounding these programs includes the competence and readiness of graduates to enter residency. 

This webinar session will discuss the key lessons learned from the development of an accelerated program guided by faculty who have considerable experience in designing and successfully implementing accelerated curricula. This session will describe the components that need to be considered when starting an accelerated program including the admissions model, curriculum development, student promotion and remediation, mentoring, partnering with residency programs, program evaluation and funding. The impact of a 3-year program in encouraging growth of primary care, reducing student debt, and enhancing the UME-to-GME continuum will also be discussed. Student outcome data including wellness and performance in residency will be presented. This webinar will be particularly informative for institutions interested in accelerated pathway medical education. 

There is still time to register yourself or your institution for the series. Is your institution already registered? Reach out to your administrative contact to get signed up for weekly updates.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

Please email support@iamse.org for more details about student registration.

Ekeoba, Lam, Manuel, and Thesen to Present “Building Pathways & Bridges”

Sometimes you just need to add more lanes to the highway. The IAMSE Webinar Committee is excited to announce our Spring series, Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations. This series will explore innovative practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities. The first session in the series will feature Jacqueline Ekeoba from teachHOUSTON (USA), Lily Lam from the City University of New York (USA), Mariam Manuel from the University of Houston (USA, and Thomas Thesen from Dartmouth College (USA).

Building Pathways & Bridges on the Bumpy Road towards Equity in STEM & Medicine

Presenters: Jacqueline Ekeoba, PhD; Lily Lam, DO; Mariam Manuel, PhD; Thomas Thesen, PhD
Session Date & Time: March 2, 2023 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: This presentation will examine the obstacles and challenges faced by marginalized communities in accessing STEM and medicine fields and explore strategies for creating more equitable pathways to success. Through an examination of current research, we will delve into the ways in which structural barriers can limit access and opportunities for underrepresented groups. To illustrate these points, the presentation will feature examples of successful outreach programs at the University of Houston College of Medicine and City University of New York School of Medicine. These programs aim to increase the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM and medicine fields by providing research opportunities, mentorship, financial support, and other resources. Overall, this presentation aims to provide understanding of the complex issues surrounding equity in STEM and Medicine, and to inspire attendees to take meaningful steps towards creating a more just and equitable future at their institutions.

There is still time to register yourself or your institution for the series. Is your institution already registered? Reach out to your administrative contact to get signed up for weekly updates.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

Please email support@iamse.org for more details about student registration.

#IAMSE23 Welcomes Meharry Medical College’s Kara Caruthers as Fourth Plenary

The 2023 IAMSE meeting in Cancun, Mexico will offer many opportunities for faculty development and networking to bring health sciences and health education across the continuum together. This year’s main topic is Teaching & Learning in Health Sciences: Linking Current Theory to Practice. The fourth and final plenary speaker is Kara Caruthers from the Meharry Medical College in the United States. She will present The Future of Medicine is Now: The Role of PA Education and the Ever-Changing Healthcare Landscape on Monday, June 12, 2023.

The Future of Medicine is Now: The Role of PA Education and the Ever-Changing Healthcare Landscape

Presented by: Kara Caruthers
Date and Time: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM

In this presentation, Kara Caruthers, MSPAS, PA-C, Immediate Past President of the PA Education Association and Associate Professor at the PA Sciences Program at Meharry Medical College, will discuss the role of PAs and PA education in the current and future healthcare environment.  PAs have been a part of American healthcare since 1965 and have grown exponentially over the last twenty years.  With the increased demand for clinicians to meet the national and global healthcare needs, she will address the role of PA education to ensure the development of competent clinicians.

For more information about speakers, events, and registration, please visit www.iamseconference.org.

We hope to see you in Cancun!

A Medical Science Educator Article Review From Dr. Inaya Hajj Hussein

This month the IAMSE publications committee review is taken from the article titled “Scoping Review: Research Training During Medical School” 2022 by Heather Murray, Jennifer Peyandak and Melanie Walker.

The article will be of interest to all medical educators involved in curricular design and implementation, seeking to find the best approach to promote research training in undergraduate medical curriculum. It is a real challenge, within the confines of the actual duration of undergraduate medical curriculum, to develop and appropriately deliver an optimally designed research training program with valued outcomes and ultimate aim of producing physicians well-trained to conduct research.

The scoping review questions: What is known about the existing undergraduate curricula structures for “research training” and the best practices that would provide training in clinical research. Database and hand search returned a total of 207 articles that were screened and assessed for eligibility. Ultimately 60 studies were included in the scoping review emanating from 5 continents and published between 1999 and 2022.

The thematic analysis extracted for research training was performed according to 5 themes: (1) variability in curriculum structures; (2) influence of mentorship on students’ experiences and career direction; (3) program length and its association with increased students’ academic output; (4) students’ assessment was primarily accomplished through assignment or presentations; and (5) program evaluation data were scarce and of poor quality.

Thirty-five institutions (58.7%) had embedded research programs, 8 (13.3%) had a dedicated year of research, 6 (10%) offered a research program in the pre-clinical years, 4 (6.7%) during the clinical years, 4 (6.7%) during summer and 1 (1.7%) pre-graduation and 2 (3.4%) unclear. The choice of enrolment also varied among programs by being mandatory in 30 (50%), optional in 15 (25%), mandatory with an optional extension in 6 (10%), and 9 (14.8 %) by application only with limited enrollment.
The total amount of time reported in research training varied across programs. Longitudinal courses expected students to spend at least 4+ hours per week or at least 120-160 hours on their projects. Full-time courses required students to conduct and complete original research within 12 months.  Short courses required students to work in group research projects fully designed by faculty. Some schools have a baseline research competency requirement that all students must meet prior to graduation and others allow students to expand their research and earn MS or PhD degrees.

Most papers 51 (85%) reported some form of faculty mentorship incorporated either as individualized (39%) or in small groups of <15 students (8%). Only one program incorporated “near peer” mentors. The data revealed the beneficial value of successful mentoring by qualified and motivated faculty; it influenced students’ scholarly success, career selection, and direction.
Some papers reported that students who participated in long-term research programs were more likely to publish or attend conferences. Other papers reported that incorporating mandatory assignments into research training or implementing research days was instrumental to promote competence through the students’ academic output. No programs described a formal evaluation process. Overall, students reported high satisfaction with their programs. Faculty had no formal feedback; however, their supervision was considered as an integral part of the research training.

Outcome: The authors have satisfactorily identified the benefits of such programs extending beyond research skills. There are not enough data available to support the adoption of any particular research training program. The structure and the optimal research training durations remain unclear; however, longer durations were associated with more academic productivity and motivation toward a physician-scientist career.

Inaya Hajj Hussein, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Foundational Medical Studies, OUWB School of Medicine

Say hello to our featured member Mildred Lopez!

Our association is a robust and diverse set of educators, students, researchers, medical professionals, volunteers and academics that come from all walks of life and from around the globe. Each month we choose a member to highlight their academic and professional career and see how they are making the best of their membership in IAMSE. This month’s Featured Member is Mildred Lopez.

Mildred Lopez, Ph.D.
Associate Dean of Academic Affairs
School of Medicine and Health Sciences TecSalud ITESM (Mexico)

How long have you been a member of IAMSE?
Just last year, I became an official member of IAMSE, although I have been sending contributions to the conference in the past years. In 2021, as part of the conference, Professor Aniela Mendez and I got the Outstanding Faculty Oral Presentation Award (June 12-17, 2021) for our presentation “Community building amid COVID-19: strategies for interaction with a gen-z class”. 

Looking at your time with the Association, what have you most enjoyed doing? What are you looking forward to? 
Being part of a community of educators that are so open to sharing best practices and learned lessons has been an incredible resource for me to get involved in meaningful experiences. A couple of years ago, I remember visiting an IAMSE stand at a conference and discussing the possibilities of my institution to have a membership and get the involvement of faculty and students. Today that is a reality. My colleague and friend, Professor Belinda Carrion, has completed her fellowship, and Professor Aniela Mendez just started the same pathway. By being part of this community, they have worked on projects that are a transformative experience for learners and other Mexican educators. 

I am looking forward to meeting some of our colleagues whom I have only met online. During the pandemic, we started to collaborate by leveraging technology, but now that the travel conditions have allowed it, I am looking forward to being able to see them in real life.

Tell us more about your #IAMSE23 pre-conference course “The 5S of Small, Sustainable, Steps to Successful Scholarship for Health Professions Educators”. What are some key takeaways that interested attendees will gain from the session?
This session is designed for faculty members that are starting their scholarship journey and would like to have a guideline on practical steps on how to approach it. The facilitators of the session have experienced the challenges of not being sure where to start on an academic career in health professions education and would love to reflect with participants on these experiences to outline steps to successful scholarship. The session will provide insights on how to plan micro-steps focusing on the long-term goal. 

I would love to invite everyone to attend this session.  

What event are you most looking forward to in Cancun?
I am looking forward to attending the focus sessions and courses related to inclusiveness. I saw one FS called “Bringing Gender and Sex Equity and Inclusivity Into Your Classroom: A Framework for Medical Educator” on Sunday, June 11, with Professors Jay Bindman, Tracy Fulton, Allison Gomez, Katherine Hyland, Matthew Ryan, and Jay Zussman about LGBTQIA+ learners and patients. Also, one called “Improving Disabilities Inclusion by Experiencing and Relating with Common Disabilities” on Monday, June 12, by Professors Shirley Delair, Mary Donovan, David Harris, and Kathryn Veazey regarding disability inclusion.

I have to say I am also looking forwards to the oral presentations. These sessions always challenge my beliefs and make me think about what comes next. In these sessions, I also get to meet wonderful people from around the globe and get ideas on how we can collaborate. 

What interesting things are you working on outside of the Association right now? Research, presentations, etc.
I am working on the capacity building of research in medical education that is published in Spanish, currently, with the role of Adjunct Editor of the Revista Mexicana de EducaciĂłn MĂŠdica (Mexican Journal of Medical Education), which is the official journal of the AsociaciĂłn Mexicana de Facultades y Escuelas de Medicina (AMFEM). We have offered several workshops to new researchers in health professional education on academic publications and are currently working on building a strong community of reviewers on this topic. I would love to invite readers to take part in this effort.  

Regarding research, I am collaborating on an international study led by Professor Cristhian PerĂŠz-Villalobos. Colleagues from universities in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, PerĂş, Paraguay, and Mexico) are analyzing the well-being of medical students during the pandemic. Several insights from that study have been the disparities in opportunities and resources for learning that have been available for distance education. I am thrilled to see where this network will evolve.

Anything else that you would like to add?
I would love to meet all the wonderful medical science educators in Cancun! Mexico is a beautiful country and has many things to offer. Please message me if you would like any recommendations during your visit 🙂

Hasta pronto! (see you soon)!


Want to learn more about Mildred and her team’s pre-conference course at the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference? Click here for more information on that session and the hundreds of other presentations happening live in June in Cancun, Mexico!

#IAMSE23 Welcomes the University of California’s Michelle Daniel as Third Plenary

The 2023 IAMSE meeting in Cancun, Mexico will offer many opportunities for faculty development and networking to bring health sciences and health education across the continuum together. This year’s main topic is Teaching & Learning in Health Sciences: Linking Current Theory to Practice. The third of our four plenary speakers is Michelle Daniel from University of California, San Diego School of Medicine in the United States. She will present Expanding Boundaries: Using a Transtheoretical Model of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Error to Improve Teaching and Assessment on Monday, June 12, 2023.

Expanding Boundaries: Using a Transtheoretical
Model of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Error
to Improve Teaching and Assessment

Presented by: Michelle Daniel
Date and Time: Monday, June 12, 2023 8:45-9:45 AM EST (UTC -5)

Multiple theories of cognition inform our understanding of clinical reasoning and diagnostic error. These theories range from “micro” theories, that focus on what goes on “in the head” to “macro” theories that extend the boundaries of clinical reasoning to what goes on “out in the world.” The most well-known “micro” theory is Dual Processing Theory. Embodied cognition, ecological psychology, situated cognition and distributed cognition are a family of social cognitive theories that offer progressively more “macro” accounts of reasoning and error. Collectively, they help us understand the mind as embodied (i.e., interacting with the body), embedded (i.e. interacting with the environment) and extended (i.e., interacting with other people and artifacts in larger systems) which can have profound impacts on how we think about teaching and assessment.

For more information about speakers, events, and registration, please visit www.iamseconference.org.

We hope to see you in Cancun!

IAMSE Winter 2023 Session 5 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Thomas Thesen, Ph.D.]

Presenters: Teresa Chan MD (McMaster University, Canada), Satid Thammasitboon MD, MHPE (Baylor College of Medicine, USA) Eric Gantwerker MD, MS, MMSc(MedEd), FACS, AFAMEE (Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, USA)

Card and Board Games for Health Professionals Education

The Winter 2023 IAMSE Webinar Seminar Series, titled “Not Just Fun & Games: Game-based Learning in Health Professions Education,” had its fourth session on Thursday, February 2. This series explores the benefits of using games in healthcare education and offers strategies for incorporating different types of games into the basic science curriculum. It covers existing literature on the theories behind using games in medical education and the results of recent research studies on the topic. The series also features speakers who will provide practical tips for implementing game-based learning in the classroom. The fifth session was presented by Dr. Teresa Chan, Dr. Eric Gantwerker and Dr. Satid Thammasitboon and was titled “Foresight, Insight & the Quest: Transforming Learning through Game-Based Learning”.

Drs. Chan, Gantwerker and Thammasitboon started by defining their definition of “Gamification”, a term that refers to the use of video game elements to improve user experience and engagement in non-gaming systems. With the rise of ‘gamified’ applications, there is a wealth of research on the heuristics, design patterns and dynamics of games and their positive impact on user experience. Gamification and serious games in education are similar in that both utilize elements of games to improve the learning experience, but they differ in their primary goal. Gamification involves adding game-like elements to non-gaming systems to increase user engagement and motivation, whereas serious games are specifically designed for educational or training purposes, using games as the primary medium to deliver content and achieve learning objectives. In other words, gamification takes a broader approach to using game elements in a variety of contexts, while serious games are specifically designed for educational outcomes. The presenters explain their approach to educational program activities by integrating faculty development, design thinking, best practices, evaluation tools, a community forum, research and a start-up arm.

The presenters stated that Game-Based Learning (GBL) has the potential to revolutionize medical science education. The idea that “gameful engagement is mostly entertainment today but it will evolve into the most powerful learning medium in history” suggests that GBL will have a future place in medical education. In medical science education, GBL offers several benefits, such as providing a more interactive and engaging way to learn complex concepts, allowing for simulation and practice in a safe environment, and promoting problem-solving skills and critical thinking. As technology continues to advance, the possibilities for GBL in medical science education will likely expand, allowing for more immersive and realistic simulations, and potentially even incorporating virtual and augmented reality elements. Overall, the presenters argue that the future of GBL in medical science education has the potential to greatly enhance the way medical professionals are trained and educated.  They also stated that game-based education has the potential to be the most effective way of learning and growing because it taps into our natural desire for interaction and engagement. By incorporating elements of play and competition, game-based learning can create a more dynamic and engaging educational experience. This approach can also foster collaboration, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. They further prophesize that ““the psychology and technology from games will transform education at every level and across every industry.”

They further offer insight into the evolution of gamification in medical education As Game-Based Learning (GBL) becomes more prevalent in medical science education, there are also challenges to be considered. Challenges or threats include: Ensuring the quality and accuracy of the educational content within the game. Balancing the competitive aspect with the educational goals. The potential for distraction and oversimplification of complex medical concepts. The need for effective evaluation and assessment of learning outcomes.

Drs. Chan, Gantwerker and Thammasitboon proposed that teaching the tools of game designers to medical educators who are serious about games is seen as a crucial step in catalyzing personalization, motivation, and engagement in learning. By incorporating cognitive and technological elements used by game designers, educators can enhance the learning experience and foster more active and engaged learners. They believe that in order to optimize the potential of Game-Based Learning (GBL) in advancing medical science education, it is important to capitalize on the opportunities and address the challenges in four key areas: Innovation, Learning, Sustainability, and Well-being. This can involve utilizing the latest technology and game design techniques, fostering a learning-centered approach, ensuring sustainability and accessibility, and incorporating considerations for student well-being into the design This can involve utilizing the latest technology and game design techniques, fostering a learning-centered approach, ensuring sustainability and accessibility, and incorporating considerations for student well-being into the design. By approaching GBL in a strategic and holistic manner, it is possible to improve the overall learning experience for students and advance medical science education. By approaching GBL in a strategic and holistic manner, it is possible to improve the overall learning experience for students and advance medical science education. Drs. Chan, Gantwerker and Thammasitboon concluded their presentation by suggesting popular non-fiction books for those who are further interested in game psychology, design and application.