News

Say hello to our featured member Gabi N. Waite!

Our association is a robust and diverse set of educators, students, researchers, medical professionals, volunteers and academics that come from all walks of life and from around the globe. Each month we choose a member to highlight their academic and professional career and see how they are making the best of their membership in IAMSE. This month’s Featured Member is Gabi N. Waite.

Gabi N. Waite, Ph.D.
Vice Chair of Education; Professor of Physiology and Immunology
Geisinger College of Health, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine

How long have you been a member of IAMSE?
I have been an IAMSE member since 2004. IAMSE was instrumental in helping to inspire my change from a bench researcher to a passionate educator and more recently administrative leader in education. 

Looking at your time with the Association, what have you most enjoyed doing? What are you looking forward to?
I most enjoy being a part of an international community of like-minded medical educators, scholars, colleagues, and friends who together have a critical role in the way medical science education evolves. I am proud of IAMSE’s growth and adaptability, and I look forward to the day that we become an even more inclusive group of global health science educators that learn from each other. 

Tell us about your Oral Presentation “Integrated but Separate: How to Enhance Recognition of Discipline Core Concepts in Horizontally & Vertically Integrated Curricula.” What got you interested in this topic? What do you hope your attendees will get out of your presentation?
The key idea originated with the need to improve immunology education in our curriculum and could not have developed without a strong team effort from the basic science faculty at Geisinger. I would also like to give all due credit to my colleague Dr. Youngjin Cho who steered an effort to develop a four-step strategy based on identification, application, and vertical and longitudinal integration of immunology core concepts. This program which we implemented at Geisinger was very successful. When we recently were asked to design and implement a new 18-month phase 1 medical curriculum within 6 months, a small leadership team of educators, including Dr. Cho, used this model to integrate all basic science disciplines into our new Total Health Curriculum. 

What workshop, session or event are you most looking forward to in Cancun?
As every meeting, I am overwhelmed by preselecting the topics since so many of them sound interesting. I am looking forward to hearing about the balance between standardization and individualization of medical education, to learning how basic science education can be tied to patient outcomes, and to seeing examples of how the medical education community responds to a renewed understanding of inclusiveness. And all this in a beautiful setting – it is definitely something to look forward to. 

What interesting things are you working on outside the Association right now?
There are too many projects to describe in detail, however, for one example, I am a co-author of a mentorship framework for basic science faculty that has been published in the IAMSE manual. We recently participated in the inaugural IAMSE mentoring certificate program and plan to stay involved in the years to come. Also, we recently started a medical education research group that involves students and faculty of six participating institutions. It is growing quickly with many evolving projects. 

Anything else that you would like to add?
IAMSE is poised for continued growth, diversity, and success while maintaining a culture of intimacy. I count it a privilege to be a small part of such a vital organization.


Want to learn more about Gabi’s Oral Presentation during the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference? Click here for more information on that program and the hundreds of other presentations happening live in June in Cancun, Mexico!

#IAMSE24 Call for Pre-Conference Faculty Development Workshops

On behalf of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE), I am pleased to announce that we are now accepting proposals for pre-conference faculty development workshops that will be delivered on Saturday, June 15, 2024, at the IAMSE 2024 Annual Conference, scheduled to be held in Minneapolis, MN, USA from June 14-18, 2024.

Proposals will be accepted through July 1, 2023. The Professional Development Committee will review all proposals and select full-day (six-hour) workshops and half-day (three-hour) workshops for the conference. 

A pre-conference faculty development workshop is intended to combine appropriate amounts of didactic presentations with significant “hands-on” opportunities for participants. Topics focus on career/professional development and should be useful for advancing the careers of the attendees. For the participants, a certificate of attendance will be available after the completion of the workshop if desired.

Proposals must include the following information:

  • Title of the workshop
  • Name and e-mail of organizer
  • Facilitator(s) information
  • Summary of the workshop and how it will advance the career of the attendee
  • Length of the workshop (3 or 6 hours)
  • Area of focus for the workshop
    • Leadership/Advancement
    • Research/Scholarship/Publications
    • Instruction/Assessment
    • Technology
  • Level of the workshop (introductory/intermediate/advanced)
  • Description of the target participants

All proposals must be submitted in the format requested through the online submission site found here.

If you have any questions about submitting your proposal, please contact IAMSE via email at support@iamse.org.

Thank you,
Jonathan Wisco, PhD
Chair, IAMSE Professional Development Committee

Congratulations to the IAMSE 2023 Distinguished & Early Career Award Winners

IAMSE, on behalf of the Professional Development Committee, would like to congratulate Amina Sadik and Stefani Attardi on receiving the Distinguished Career Award and Early Career Award, respectively.

The Distinguished Career Award for Excellence in Teaching and Educational Scholarship recognizes an IAMSE member who has a distinguished record of educational scholarship, including educational research and dissemination of scholarly approaches to teaching and education. Candidates must have a significant record of engagement within IAMSE. Amina Sadik, the 2023 awardee, is a Professor of Basic Sciences at Touro University Nevada, College of Osteopathic Medicine.

The Early Career Award for Excellence in Teaching and Innovation honors an IAMSE member who has made significant innovations to the field in the short time they have focused their careers toward enhancing teaching, learning and assessment. Candidates must have demonstrated less than 10 years of educational scholarship. Stefanie Attardi, the 2023 recipient, is an Assistant Professor of Foundational Medical Studies (Histology and Anatomy) in the Department of Foundational Medical Studies at Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine. 

Congratulations to Dr. Sadik and Dr. Attardi. They will both be honored at the 27th Annual IAMSE Meeting in early June. Good luck to both of you in all your future endeavors.

Thank you,
Jonathan Wisco
Chair, IAMSE Professional Development Committee


For more information on workshops and presentations or to register for the
2023 IAMSE Annual Conference please visit www.IAMSEconference.org

A Medical Science Educator Article Review From Dr. Jennifer A. Fischer

This month the IAMSE publications committee review is taken from the article titled “What Makes a Near-Peer Learning and Tutoring Program Effective in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Analysis” published in Medical Science Educator (7 November 2022) by Seth McKenzie Alexander, Gary L. Beck Dallaghan, Michele Birch, Kelly Lacy Smith, Neva Howard, and Christina L. Shenvi. 

Promoting student success in undergraduate medical education is critical for all medical schools. This success leads to providing quality healthcare for patients, but at an institutional level student success also increases the quality of the student experience, student attrition, success on licensing exams, and achievement in residency programs. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and remote activities, we now have a cohort of students whose academic foundation often does not match previous education models. In light of this, identifying strategies that benefit learner’s academic success can be critically important to undergraduate medical school performance.  

This article highlights a qualitative analysis on the effectiveness of a near-peer learning and tutoring program at the University of North Carolina. The survey-based study provides insight, from both learners and tutors, that were thematically analyzed to identify key areas for both groups. Responses examined learner benefits, descriptions of what made a successful tutoring relationship, and potential pitfalls. Survey results presented here can help guide tutor training at other institutions to support student academic success.  

The authors’ findings showed important agreement between both learners and tutors to identify educational activities that were most helpful to the provision of successful tutoring sessions. The analysis also recognized key characteristics of learners beneficial to the learner-tutor relationship and traits a tutor needs to be successful.  As institutions seek to find strategies that enhance the learner experience and promote academic success, this research allows medical educators to consider what elements of peer tutoring programs support learner development. The utility of student tutors can work cooperatively with faculty and other programs to promote good academic standing and often provides an additional resource to improve learner achievement. 

Jennifer A. Fischer, PhD 
Associate Professor 
Department of Molecular Biology 
Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine 

Last Call to Submit Manuscripts for the MSE 2023 Special Section

The deadline to submit manuscripts for the MSE 2023 Special Section In 2023, Medical Science Educator, the journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE), will publish a special journal section dedicated to the topic:

Health Science Students as Future Educators:
How to Support and Encourage Them

In this section, the journal would like to explore initiatives from around the world to motivate their students to become future educators.

During their careers as physicians or biomedical science researchers, many will at some point in time get involved in teaching health sciences students. Still, most students graduate without formal training in education. In some schools students can voluntarily get involved in educational activities such as peer teaching, educational committees, and education projects, while in other places mandatory student-as-teacher programs are being offered to teach students the principles of classroom and small-group teaching techniques, and to introduce them to health sciences education scholarship. 

The Editorial Board of Medical Science Educator is currently soliciting article submissions to inform the readership about initiatives to support and encourage students to develop as educators. See our website www.medicalscienceeducator.org for a more detailed description of these article types. All submissions will be peer-reviewed in our regular review process. Accepted manuscripts will be clustered together into a special section in issue 33(6), or will be published in one of the regular issues afterwards.

Manuscripts to be considered for these sections must be submitted by May 1st, 2023 through our online submission system at www.medicalscienceeducator.org. In your cover letter, please refer to the topic “Students as Future Educators” to indicate that you would like to be included in the special section. See our journal website for the Instructions for Authors.

We look forward to receiving your submissions.

IAMSE Spring 2023 Session 4 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Tracey A. H. Taylor, Ph.D.]

Academic Readiness for the Pre-clerkship Curriculum: A closer look at the metrics in pathway students

In the fourth session of the series, the speaker was Stephen Schneid, the Director for Educational Development and Scholarship at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. He is also the lead instructor for the UCSD Division of Extended Studies. The title of this session was “Academic Readiness for the Pre-clerkship Curriculum: A closer look at the metrics in pathway students”.

Stephen Schneid first discussed academic readiness for the preclinical medical curriculum by describing two major pathways to medical school: (1) pre-college, followed by college [usually four years and includes prerequisites, the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT), and apply to medical school], followed by Undergraduate Medical Education (UGME; pre-clerkship and clerkship phase, licensure exams and applying for residency), and then the Graduate Medical Education (GME) phase; and (2) a second pathway involves a gap between the college and UGME phases. Some students need “something” to help them to gain entry to medical school during that time, including Postbaccalaureate Premedical Program (PBPM) and/or Prematriculation courses. PBPM is the focus for this session. Mr. Schneid summarized some data from American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) data reports that focus on the timing of the curriculum structure, specifically the length of the pre-clerkship phase, which is often two years but can be 18 months or even one year in length1. This is the time when the information flow rate of curricular content is very high. The high flow rate is overwhelming to some students, especially when they are also learning new methods of studying, managing life changes, and learning time management. The pre-clerkship medical curriculum consists of the biomedical sciences, the clinical sciences, and the emerging field of health system sciences, and academic readiness is important for students to be successful. There are several ways to assess student progression: pre-clerkship academic performance (often pass/fail), graduation rates, attrition rates, time to graduation, and United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) step 1 (now pass/fail). The most recent pass rate for first time test takers of USMLE Step 1 in 2022 is 93% in US and Canadian Medical schools, which is slightly below the historic pass rate of approximately 96%, dating back to 20122.  The four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates from the AAMC have been steady over time from 1997 to 20173. Finally, attrition rates for US medical schools (AAMC) can be due to academic or non-academic factors for any MD or combination MD program, and these rates are low3.

Academic readiness is important for all of these metrics, but individual schools can also affect student success with curricular structure, assessment structure and systems, availability of learning specialists, tutoring programs, third party resources, and other factors. The AAMC core competencies for entering medical school include four thinking/reasoning competencies (critical thinking, quantitative reasoning, scientific inquiry, and written communication) and two science competencies (living systems and human behavior)4. Other competencies include reliability/dependability, resilience/adaptability, and capacity for improvement. Mr. Schneid discussed two major academic metrics that can be used to assess these various competencies: grade point average (GPA; including cumulative total; cumulative biology, chemistry, physics and math or BCPM; grade trend, and PBPM GPA) and MCAT (score range 472-528). The validity of the new MCAT exam for predicting student performance was evaluated and demonstrated that the MCAT gives a strong sense of academic readiness, and is predictive of academic success after year one of medical school in the medical schools involved in the study5. A more recent study evaluated MCAT scores with academic success in the pre-clerkship years, USMLE step 1, clerkship performance, and USMLE Step CK at several medical schools and found a similar pattern of the MCAT being predictive of academic success using median correlation scores6. AAMC data supported these trends that higher MCAT scores and higher GPAs were associated with a higher acceptance rate to medical school7. 7% of applicants with GPAs 3.00-3.19 and MCAT scores 494-497 were admitted into at least one medical school while 25% of applicants with GPAs 3.20-3.39 and MCAT scores 502-505 were admitted into at least one medical school. Success in PBPM programs can result in students earning a higher GPA, and also a higher MCAT score, thereby increasing the chances of successful admittance to medical school.

Mr. Schneid next provided an overview of postbaccalaureate premedical (PBPM) programs. According to the AAMC database, PBPM Programs are increasing, with 314 programs in 2023 compared with only 117 in 20068. These programs provide a pathway for students that may not exist otherwise9. There are two main types of PBPM programs: academic record-enhancer programs (ARE), and career changer (CC) programs; and some programs contain elements of both types. ARE programs are targeted for students who seek to enhance their GPA and MCAT scores, are more likely to have formal curricula, and make up approximately 39% of PBPM programs10. CC programs are targeted for students who have not completed premedical coursework, are more likely to have personalized learning plan curricula, and make up approximately 27% of PBPM programs10. Interestingly, 7.1% of 2022 US medical student matriculants participated in an ARE program, while 7.7% participated in a CC program11. Some specialized PBPM programs focus on underrepresented students and/or students from educationally or economically disadvantaged backgrounds8. Of these Diversity-based mission PBPM programs, 89% require an interview, 56% require a demonstrated commitment to underserved communities, and 28% contain a service learning requirement11. When looking at matriculating student questionnaire data and PBPMs, nearly 25% of students were Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM), indicating that PBPMs may be an important pathway for URiM students to medical school12. Graduates from one diversity-based mission PBPM program were more likely to practice medicine as primary care physicians (49.1% of graduates), and more likely to practice medicine in health professional shortage areas or medically underserved areas/populations (82% of graduates), indicating the important impact of these types of programs13. It is difficult to find publications indicating how PBPM students perform in medical school, however one study found that CC PBPM program students show a small but persistent academic lag in the first two years of medical school and in USMLE Step 1 scores compared with traditionally prepared students, but that the difference disappears for Step 2CK14.

The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) one-year ARE PBPM Program was created in 201215. The program consists of foundational science courses, MCAT preparation, workshops, UCSD school of medicine faculty advisors, PBPM Program student liaisons, and a program committee letter of recommendation that is provided to each graduate for applying to medical school15. Schneid’s group analyzed PBPM student metrics at UCSD school of medicine, and compared to students who did not complete a PBPM16.  PBPM students were more likely to be URiM (32% vs 16%), and the PBPM student MCAT percentile means were only slightly lower than non-PBPM students (85.0 vs 91.7)16. Pre-clerkship performance was similar (82.6% for PBPM vs 84.9% for non-PBPM), as were USMLE step 1 scores (226 for PBPM vs 236 for non-PBPM). However, all PBPM students passed step 1, while 1% of non-PBPM students did not pass step 116. Among the variables, MCAT and PBPM program GPA contributed significantly to the prediction of pre-clerkship performances and USMLE Step 1 scores. Overall, this data show that PBPM students demonstrate academic readiness for medical school.

Stephen Schneid’s major take-aways were that a higher proportion of UCSD school of medicine students from PBPM programs were URiM and social science majors; and that while PBPM program students at UCSD school of medicine had lower GPAs and MCAT scores, they performed well academically. The PBPM program GPA can provide important information about a student’s academic readiness as it is a more recent snapshot than cumulative GPAs. Medical schools and other health professions programs should take a closer look at applicants from PBPM programs. PBPM programs add an important lane on the road to medical school and other health professions programs for students.

References:

  1. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/structure-pre-clerkship-curriculum
  2. https://www.usmle.org/early-release-usmle-step-1-2022-summary-performance
  3. https://www.aamc.org/media/48526/download
  4. https://www.aamc.org/services/admissions-lifecycle/competenciesentering-medical-students
  5. Busche K, Elks ML, Hanson JT, et al. The validity of scores from the new MCAT exam in predicting student performance: results from a multisite study. Acad Med. 2020;95:387-395.
  6. Hanson JT, Busche K, Elks ML, Jackson-Williams LE, Liotta RA, Miller C, Morris CA, Thiessen B, Yuan K. The Validity of MCAT Scores in Predicting Students’ Performance and Progress in Medical School: Results From a Multisite Study. Acad Med. 2022 Sep 1;97(9):1374-1384. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004754. Epub 2022 May 24. PMID: 35612915.
  7. https://www.aamc.org/media/6091/download?attachment
  8. https://mec.aamc.org/postbac/#/index
  9. McDougle L, Way DP, Lee WK, et al. A national long-term outcomes evaluation of U.S. premedical postbaccalaureate programs designed to promote health care access and workforce diversity. J Healthcare Poor Underserved. 2015;26(3):631-647.
  10. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/matriculating-student-questionnaire-msq
  11. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2018). Postbaccalaureate Premedical Programs in the U.S.: Results of a National Survey. AAMC Analysis in Brief, 18(6).
  12. Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. Characteristics of medical school matriculants who participated in postbaccalaureate premedical programs. Acad Med. 2011;86:201-210.
  13. Smitherman HC, Aranha ANF, Matthews D, Dignan A, Morrison M, Ayers E, Robinson L, Smitherman LC, Sprague KJ, Baker RS. Impact of a 50-Year Premedical Postbaccalaureate Program in Graduating Physicians for Practice in Primary Care and Underserved Areas. Acad Med. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):416-424.
  14. Baill, I. C., Khallouq, B. B., Joledo, O., Jacobs, A., Larkin, R., & Dil, N. (2019). How postbaccalaureate career changer and traditional medical students differ academically. Southern Medical Journal, 112(12), 610–616.
  15. Schneid SD, Fricovsky ES, Loehr PG, Kim JG. A pipeline for health systems science in postbaccalaureate premedical programmes. Med Educ. 2022 May;56(5):568-569. doi: 10.1111/medu.14757. Epub 2022 Mar 4. PMID: 35244222.
  16. Schneid SD, Kelly CJ, Brandl K. Relationships between preadmission variables and academic outcomes for postbaccalaureate students in medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Oct;27(4):1033-1048.

Say hello to our featured member Rachel Porter!

Our association is a robust and diverse set of educators, students, researchers, medical professionals, volunteers and academics that come from all walks of life and from around the globe. Each month we choose a member to highlight their academic and professional career and see how they are making the best of their membership in IAMSE. This month’s Featured Member is Rachel Porter.

Rachel Porter, MEd, PhD
Senior Education Strategist
Duke University School of Medicine – Physician Assistant Program

How long have you been a member of IAMSE?
I believe I joined in 2018.

Looking at your time with the Association, what have you most enjoyed doing? What are you looking forward to? How does IAMSE benefit physician assistant educators? 
I have really enjoyed being a member of the WAS and Publications committees and, of course, attending and presenting at the annual conferences. I was not able to be in Denver last year, so am really looking forward to the annual conference in Cancun – which will be my first back in person. I am also looking forward to the fall webinar series, which will be all about AI. The WAS committee has an exciting sequence of topics and super interesting speakers lined up, so it should be a great series!

IAMSE benefits PA educators in so many ways – the resources within the various publications and events, as well as connections with such a wide variety of health professions faculty and staff who are members or attend the different functions. Even with the such vast diversity of disciplines and institutions, there are so many issues and areas that touch us all; being able to tap into so many different perspectives around meeting those challenges and address various issues is extremely beneficial.

Tell us about your Focus Session “You Already Know How to Do This! Linking Med+Sci+Ed to Elevate Teaching Practice”. What got you interested in this topic? What do you hope your attendees will get out of your session?
I am very excited to give this session with two of my colleagues who represent PA clinical practice and medical sciences. It may seem a bit theoretical, but we aim to share some very practical perspectives and strategies that we know are helpful for health professions faculty. We’ve constructed some interesting – and hopefully very relatable – classroom and student “cases” that we will walk through and apply the different lenses from medicine, science and education. That case application will show where the three different approaches overlap and connect, and we’ll discuss not only why those connections are important but also how they can be leveraged for improved teaching and learning experiences. 

I hope that connecting the commonalities among medicine, scientific research, and education helps participants relate the practice of teaching to their “home disciplines” and that the case applications create good discussions around some of the challenges we all encounter in the learning environment. Participants should walk away with practical tips that contribute to further applications and conversations in their programs and settings. I also hope that I pick up some new ideas and perspectives because I always look forward to sessions being a two-way conversation, where I am likely to learn as much or more than participants do.

Your poster was recently selected to present during the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference – congratulations! What can you tell us about “Reimagining Student Orientation – Onboarding for Success”? Tell us about how changing your onboarding process helped your PA program at Duke. 
We began the planning to redesign our student orientation process in 2018, with the goals of shortening the amount of time it took – which at the time, was roughly two weeks at the start of the first semester in fall – and improving the overall student experience. Our students were telling us that it was too much information at the very beginning and made them feel overwhelmed as they started the program.

In early 2020, we had a committee of faculty and staff working on the redesign, and also recruited groups of students to inform our process. We had started to condense the amount of information, and rethink our delivery model. During COVID we trimmed the schedule of orientation activities to just one week. Student reacted positively to the remote delivery, but still reflected that they were overwhelmed.

Based on that remote pivot and the student feedback, we came to the idea of turning “orientation” into “onboarding”. We included video messages and written announcements to accompany a checklist of items to complete at their own pace over the summer. By the time they got to the onsite orientation activities in August (now over just 4 days and in small groups in accordance with pandemic protocols), they had been getting to know us for two months.

We kept much of that process for our next cohort, tweaking the Class of 2024 Resources course and also including new items like name pronunciation tools to help build a more inclusive culture. We feel that onboarding is definitely providing a better student (and faculty and staff!) experience and smoother transition into the program than our previous orientation process. It’s even easier to implement since much of it lives in our LMS. For other programs that include or need a robust student orientation, I think an onboarding approach should be considered and that many of the tools and strategies we have used could be incorporated fairly easily. 

What are you most looking forward to in Cancun?
Other than just being back in person, and the great location, I am really looking forward to the plenary by Dr. Anique de Bruin on desirable difficulty. I’ll be interested in how that connects to the concept of productive struggle, which is the topic of one of the focus sessions I am looking forward to attending. I am also excited about Dr. Michelle Daniel’s plenary – particularly with it being just before our focus session, since I can see some obvious connections. I can’t wait to hear from our participants about their connections and reflections. 

What interesting things are you working on outside the Association right now?
I will be at AAMC SGEA this weekend presenting strategies for making faculty searches more equitable. My colleagues and I recently published an article on that topic in JPAE. I am also working on some projects related to affinity groups and their impact on inclusive culture – for faculty, staff, and students. AI seems to be on everyone’s mind recently, and I am engaging quite a bit with those conversations about new developments and the impact we are already seeing in healthcare and education. Policies and policy-making are also of particular interest to me, and there are some pretty significant things happening in my state, North Carolina, as well as nationally; so I am always engaged in how best to bring those issues to our program and students in ways that will be valuable to them and their future patients. 

Anything else that you would like to add?
I am very excited about the annual conference in June and always love attending these events. I will say, though, that I find it valuable to engage with IAMSE members more than that once a year conference. There are many opportunities, but participating in the WAS and Publications committees has been incredibly rewarding and helps me feel connected. I encourage other members to consider joining committees they might be interested in – it’s a great way to contribute, be part of the conversation, and get to know other members.


Want to learn more about Rachel’s Focus Session during the IAMSE 2023 Annual Conference? Click here for more information on that program and the hundreds of other presentations happening live in June in Cancun, Mexico!

Don’t Miss Any of Our Networking Sessions at #IAMSE23

When asked about the standout experiences of in-person meetings, most people we’ve asked over the last few years reply, “The ability to see colleagues and friends for networking over lunch, dinner, in a workshop, or in the hallway of the conference center.” The 27th annual IAMSE meeting hopes to offer as many opportunities for quality engagement as possible! Each day of the meeting will feature multiple opportunities to meet with other educators and share ideas, resources, and discuss topics of interest. 

Saturday

  • Student Reception – 3:30pm – 5:30pm
  • Opening Reception – 7:15pm – 8:45pm

Sunday

  • Roundtable discussions – 7:30am – 8:30am
  • Networking Lunch – 11:30am – 12:30pm
  • Poster & Exhibitor Viewing – 4:45pm – 5:45pm

Monday

  • Roundtable discussions – 7:30am – 8:30am
  • Coffee Break and Networking with Exhibitors – 10:00am – 10:30am
  • Networking Lunch – 12:00pm – 1:15pm
  • Poster & Exhibitor Viewing – 2:30pm – 3:30pm
  • Mayan Midsummer Feast (tickets required) – 6:30pm – 9:30pm

Tuesday

  • Roundtable discussions – 7:30am – 8:30am
  • Grand Extravaganza (tickets required) – The Traveler’s Table – 5:00pm – 11:00pm

For more information about speakers, events, and registration, please visit www.iamseconference.org. If you have any questions, please reach out to support@iamse.org.

IAMSE Spring 2023 Session 3 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Andrea Belovich, Ph.D.]

Fostering Community Through Rural Pipelines and Pathways

The Spring 2023 IAMSE Web Seminar Series, “Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations,” began on March 2nd, 2023 and concludes on March 30th, 2023. In this five-part series, experts and innovators share their practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities.

The third session for this series, entitled “Fostering Community Through Rural Pipelines and Pathways,” was co-presented on March 16th, 2023 by Dr. Natasha Bray, Campus Dean of Oklahoma State University (OSU) College of Osteopathic Medicine at the Cherokee Nation and Associate for accreditation for the OSU Center for Health Sciences, and Dr. Machelle Linsenmeyer, Professor and Associate Dean for Assessment and Educational Development at the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (WVSOM). Together, these speakers presented information about pathway programs their institutions have implemented to increase awareness of health challenges experienced in rural, underserved, and tribal communities. They also emphasized the importance of recruiting physicians to rural and underserved areas of the United States and provided an overview of how their respective programs accomplish this by working with students across the educational continuum, residents, faculty, staff, and community members.

Dr. Bray began the webinar by presenting one of the pathway programs at OSU designed to train and recruit physicians to care for underserved populations in rural Oklahoma (OK), with a particular focus on training physicians to provide care for tribal communities in the state. To achieve this goal, OSU opened the first College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) with a tribal affiliation, OSU-COM at the Cherokee Nation (OSU-COMCN), in 2020. To demonstrate the impetus for opening the new COM, Dr. Bray provided the audience with background about the health outcomes in OK, sharing compelling statistics about high rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and mental distress. Dr. Bray acknowledged that strategies to develop the rural and tribal physician workforce are both a multigenerational process and a long-term investment in the infrastructure necessary to address the physician shortage for underserved communities.

OSU-COMCN’s overall pathway strategy culminates in the “R3” program, which is designed to recruit Rural students to medical school, educate them in completely Rural environments, and place graduates of the program in Rural-based residency programs. By recruiting members of the target communities into medical school and conducting their medical education in rural environments, the program trains physicians that are more likely to practice medicine in rural communities.

Dr. Bray discussed several recruitment programs, some of which begin as early as elementary school and are intended to inspire children to become health care providers by providing early exposure to the health sciences. Programs aimed at recruiting high school students include the “Blue Coat to White Coat” program, which is aimed at members of the National Future Farmers of America (FFA) Organization, Dr. Pete’s Medical Immersion Camp, and Operation Orange. In particular, Dr. Bray focused on Operation Orange, which is a one-day camp for students in grades 8-12. Participants are able to meet medical students, learn about career opportunities in the healthcare field, participate in hands-on demonstrations including suturing and simulated intubation, and learn about anatomy with human brains, hearts, and lungs. Operation Orange is hosted both on the OSU-COMCN campus and in communities on tribal lands to increase access as much as possible.

OSU also utilizes pathway programs that support rurally recruited students through college. OSU helps these students prepare to be successful in medical school by pairing them with mentors early in their collegiate experience to help navigate classes and MCATs, as well as to prepare them for application, matriculation, and beyond. to medical school. Furthermore, OSU fosters an environment that is aware of rural/underserved populations, with different programs that support specific populations (like Native American students and other underrepresented minorities). Once students matriculate into OSU’s medical program, the rural training experience is further supported by OSU-COM’s Tribal and Rural Medical training tracks. During 3rd and 4th year rotations, these tracks (parallel training programs) provide carefully selected clinical, research, and leadership experiences in rural or tribal settings throughout the state to allow students to experience the social determinants of health that their future patients are likely to experience. For the Tribal Medical track, 85% of core rotations are conducted in tribally operated health centers, while core rotations in the Rural Medical track are conduced in critical access hospitals and community-based hospitals. Students are also required to do two audition rotations with primary care residencies based in those communities.

Dr. Bray concluded her portion of the webinar with an overview and outcomes of the rural and tribal affiliated residency programs in the state, including three Family Medicine programs and one Pediatric program affiliated with the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Nations. In total, there are 10 rural or tribal OSU-affiliated residency programs, with 157 available slots that encompass Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pediatrics. Data from the OSU Tulsa campus show that the vast majority (~80%) of OSU-COM students stay in the state of Oklahoma, with 80-95% of those graduates practicing primary care in medically underserved communities across the state.

Dr. Linsenmeyer then continued the webinar by presenting the pathway programs developed by the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (WVSOM). Like the state of Oklahoma, West Virginia (WV) ranks low in regards to health outcomes (47/50). Health factors common throughout the state include decreased life expectancy, opioid use, and industrial issues that occur that affect health outcomes (such as coal mining) in more desolate areas. Furthermore, nearly all counties in the state are primary care shortage areas. To address these shortages, it has been proposed to bolster the primary care physician pipelines, beginning in local communities and in high schools.

Dr. Linsenmeyer shared that WVSOM is nationally recognized for its efforts in addressing Rural, Family, and Primary Care medicine, as it is the top school in the nation in graduating students who practice in rural areas. WVSOM is also ranked 4th in the nation for percentage of medical school graduates who enter primary care residencies, with 69% of their graduates from 2018-2020 doing so. Part of WVSOM’s success is due to the various pipeline and pathway programs that target various levels of education in local communities. This includes programs that target high school students, such as Anatomy lab tours, summer camps that teach topics such as neuroscience and infectious disease, and CPR training camps. Programs that target college students include the Pre-Osteopathic Med Program (POMP), and bridge programs such as the West Liberty to WVSOM Bridge program, and the West Virginia Wesleyan Bridge “Go D.O.” program. WVSOM also has a “Green Coat” program that partners with rural hospitals to allow students to be immersed in those settings. In addition to high school and college programs, WVSOM also targets residents and community members with the Rural Outreach Program and the Center for Rural and Community Health.

Dr. Linsenmeyer next provided the audience with a close look at WVSOM’s Rural Health Initiative (RHI), which is a pipeline program intended to help train WVSOM medical students to practice in underserved communities across WV and support community involvement of West Virginians in health education. The RHI has approximately 14-18 students per class year, with additional events that are open to all WVSOM students. While all WVSOM students spend 12 weeks in a rural rotation setting, RHI students do extra rural rotations and are stationed at rural rotation base sites. RHI students and RHI pipeline students spend a total of 20 weeks in rural rotations during their third year and 8 weeks in rural rotations during their fourth year. In addition to gaining additional exposure to the needs of rural WV communities, RHI students are also assigned a practicing rural physician as a mentor, financial incentives (scholarships and sign-on incentives for WV residencies), and housing support that allows them to stay and live in rural communities during years 3 and 4. Additionally, the RHI promotes activities to promote rural research medicine, culminating in a Rural Practice/Rural Primary Care Day event. The RHI also hosts a Wilderness Medicine Rotation and four Industry-relevant activities per year that are open to all WVSOM students. Overall, in 2022, 100% of RHI graduating students reported increased or confirmed interest in practicing in a rural area.

Dr. Linsenmeyer then shared examples of the types of industry related activities offered by the RHI to acquaint students with the health impacts of major state industries (e.g., logging, mining, agriculture, etc.) to better understand the occupational diseases and environmental exposures common in rural West Virginian communities. Additionally, these events are used as opportunities for students to learn about the unique aspects of Appalachian culture than can impact health outcomes (such as folklore and home remedies), allowing them to better understand the needs, backgrounds, and motivations of their future patients.

One such example of these activities is a Coal Mining Simulation and Training event. This event simulates a coal mining accident and rescue and is conducted 5 miles inside a coal mine at a depth of 900 feet. Prior to the simulation, faculty, and industry personnel conduct classroom instruction for the students to familiarize them with background information relevant to the case and the equipment present in the mine. Dr. Linsenmeyer then showed a video of what happens during this event, reporting that it is very a popular experience. Additionally, Dr. Linsenmeyer described WVSOM’s Wilderness Medicine Rotation, which offers wilderness medicine experiences to students, residents, and community member such as firefighters, EMS workers, and national guard community members. Clinical and basic science faculty provide integrated education on topics such insect bites, altitude sickness, flight physiology, and cold-water immersion and drowning, and many more.

Impacts of the RHI include Rural Health advocacy at the capitol and exposing students to legislative processes to gain get a better understanding of how they can advocate for rural health initiatives. Other RHI program outcomes show that RHI graduates have high rates of retention as practicing physicians in WV, with 58% of RHI graduates from 2013-2018 who matched into WV primary care or emergency medicine programs starting practice in WV. Additionally, Dr. Linsenmeyer shared success stories of students who participated in WVSOM’s pipeline program that demonstrated the personal impact these programs have for graduates. Dr. Linsenmeyer finished the webinar with an exposĂ© of WVSOM’s pipeline programs are targeted to residents and community members. WVSOM’s Rural Leadership Fellowship program is a 1-year program with about 10 residents per year and provides stipends to residents to attend training in their specialty. After completing their fellowship training, residents and return to share their training with in-house staff. Community oriented pipeline programs include global and national activities that involve all first responders in the community (fire, EMS, police), the National Guard, Airports and Life Flight operators to join residents, medical students and faculty/staff in various simulations such as automobile accidents and Mass Casualty events with standardized patients. WVSOM also partners with the International Mines Rescue Competition, with 27 teams from 9 countries competing for best rescue outcomes. Finally, Dr. Linsenmeyer shared various programs that allow WVSOM to reach out to the community and increase awareness of the health professions in grade school and middle school students. The Center for Rural and Community Health (CRCH) allows WVSOM students to participate in outreach activities for kids ages 6-11 (grade school and middle school), as well as the opportunity to be involved in several aspects of the community.

Amiri to Present “Progress and Challenge of Pathway Programs”

Sometimes you just need to add more lanes to the highway. The IAMSE Webinar Committee is excited to announce our Spring series, Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations. This series will explore innovative practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities. The final session in the series will feature Leila Amiri of the Robert Larner MD, College of Medicine at the University of Vermont (USA).

Leila Amiri

Progress and Challenge of Pathway Programs

Presenter: Leila Amiri, PhD
Session Date & Time: March 30, 2023 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: The goal of diversifying the physician workforce has been in the forefront of medical education for several decades. Despite this seemingly concerted effort we still do not show a significant increase towards a workforce that reflects the healthcare needs of the diverse population of the United States. Pathway programs have been found to be successful in targeted recruitment of learners into medicine. In this session we will discuss how we can think about the steps involved in developing an admissions process as one element towards the goal of an equitable system of educating physicians. We will also consider some of the shared challenges that programs and participants face towards achieving this goal.

There is still time to register yourself or your institution for the series. Is your institution already registered? Reach out to your administrative contact to get signed up for weekly updates.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

Please email support@iamse.org for more details about student registration.

IAMSE Spring 2023 Session 1 Highlights

[The following notes were generated by Andrea Belovich, Ph.D.]

Building Pathways & Bridges on the Bumpy Road Towards Equity in STEM & Medicine

The Spring 2023 IAMSE Web Seminar Series, “Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations,” began on March 2nd, 2023 and concludes on March 30th, 2023. In this five-part series, experts and innovators share their practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities.

The opening seminar for this series, entitled “Building Pathways & Bridges on the Bumpy Road Towards Equity in STEM & Medicine” was co-presented as a panel discussion on March 2nd, 2023 by Drs. Jacqueline Ekeoba, Thomas Thesen, Mariam Manuel, and Lily Lam. Dr. Ekeoba is a Master Teacher in the Mathematics Department of the University of Houston’s College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, and Dr. Manuel is a Clinical Assistant Professor and Science Master Teacher, also in the Mathematics Department of the University of Houston’s College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics. Dr. Thesen is an Associate Professor of Medical Education at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, and Dr. Lam is a medical student advisor and an Assistant Clinical Professor in the Department of Medicine of the City University New York School of Medicine. Together, these speakers presented the challenges and obstacles faced by students from Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) groups in the pursuit of careers in the fields of STEM and Medicine. These speakers also shared examples of their institutions’ solutions to promote equity, inclusion, and support for URiM students in STEM and medicine.

Dr. Ekeoba began the webinar with a brief introduction of the overall problem of the “leaky pipeline” that frequently occurs in STEM and medicine, which often results in students from URiM groups have low rates of entry into the STEM and medicine careers. Dr. Thesen then followed with data and statistics regarding the current state of underrepresented and diverse populations in medical practice and medical education. As seen in the 2021 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)1, there are significant disparities between the proportion of URiM groups in the general United States population compared to the proportion of URiM groups in the physician workforce.

Dr. Thesen then went on to explain the impacts these disparities have on inequity at both the individual and societal levels. Inequity at the individual level takes the form of reduced opportunities, including reduced access to higher paying professional jobs and limiting generational opportunities. On the societal level, these disparities lead to inequity in healthcare, as the lack of physicians sharing cultural and lived experiences similar to those of their patients can lead to the many well-documented, unequal outcomes along the lines of race and equity in medicine. Regarding the percentage of medical students who plan to serve in underserved areas, Dr. Thesen highlighted findings that show that medical students from URiM groups are more likely to return to underserved communities to practice medicine. Thus, graduating doctors from underserved groups is considered a strategy to expand patient access and improving quality of care in underserved communities.

Dr. Thesen next discussed challenges to expanding URiM representation in medicine, citing AAMC data2 showing that neither the application rate nor the acceptance rate for medical school from certain URiM groups have changed significantly since the 1970’s. Dr. Thesen also pointed out that once URiM students are accepted into medical school, they often find that relatively few medical school faculty are from URiM backgrounds2, so it can be a challenge for URiM students to find role models and mentors from their own communities or lived experiences provide career advice and opportunities and recommendations, making the medical school experience harder for URiM students. Dr. Thesen emphasized the importance of acknowledging the socioeconomic, educational, and psychosocial realities and barriers that many URiM students face. Thus, these challenges and other systematic barriers need to be considered when creating pipeline programs with the goal of reducing “leak” to support URiM students on their path to STEM and Medicine careers.

Next, Dr. Manuel presented an example of a successful pathway (pipeline) program that begins at the high school level: the NSF-funded STEM Research Inquiry Summer Enrichment (STEM-RISE) program at the University of Houston. The STEM-RISE program is an interdepartmental collaboration between the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics and the Tilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine at the University of Houston, along with the Jack Yates High School, which is a high-needs public high school in the historic neighborhood of Third Ward in Houston. Dr. Manuel described this program as an authentic community-based partnership program, as they worked together with the local community to plan the project. Dr. Manuel emphasized the importance of having strong interpersonal connections between members of the different schools, as this helps form a stronger community with other teachers and supports with recruitment efforts.

In short, the STEM-RISE experience is a 6-week summer program that includes 3 participant groups: medical students, undergraduate STEM majors in the teachHouston program, and high school students. All participants are offered incentives, which includes a summer professional development program and a stipend for medical and undergraduate students. The high school students also receive a stipend and gain hands-on STEM and laboratory experiences, which includes lessons on scientific principles and topics to support their laboratory learning outside of the lab. In combination with the opportunity to interview campus STEM faculty, these students are supported in the college and career readiness by being allowed to tour the campus and interact with a variety of campus resources. The program concludes with a celebratory research symposium and a group bowling party.

Dr. Ekeoba then shared more information about the layered mentoring that occurs throughout the STEM-RISE program and the research symposium. High school students are paired together and are assigned to different laboratory projects, but they are also grouped with undergraduate, graduate and medical school students to provide peer and near-peer mentorship along the education and career continuum. Undergraduate students also participate in a “Research Methods” course that allows them to conduct their own research and learn lessons they can carry forward into their own teaching careers. Faculty are also part of this layered mentorship, providing formalized mentorship time to help teach students how to be future mentors and teachers themselves. In addition to formal experiences, informal conversations at mealtimes provide opportunities for development of students’ college applications and career path planning. Dr. Ekeoba concluded this segment of the webinar with a video testimonial from a medical student STEM-RISE participant, who shared her story as a first-generation URiM medical student and how much she valued being part of supporting younger high school and undergraduate students as a mentor.

Dr. Manuel then described more of the inclusive community created by the STEM-RISE program, which culminates in the end-of-program Research Symposium, which focuses on the accomplishments of the STEM-RISE participants. In addition to presenting their research projects, high school student participants are also asked to give a presentation of the career pathway they would like to pursue. Dr. Manuel stated that the supportive environment of the symposium provides positive feedback and encouragement for URiM high school students to pursue careers in STEM and Medicine.

Dr. Lam then continued the webinar with more information about the Health Professions Mentorship Program (HPMP) at the Sophie Davis Biomedical Education Program CUNY School of Medicine, with is an 18-month pipeline/pathway program designed for rising high school juniors and seniors. Similar to the STEM-RISE program a the University of Houston, CUNY’s HPMP involves layered and multi-tiered mentoring. Students are placed into small groups and are assigned to a medical student mentor. High school students in the second year of the program are also encouraged to provide mentorship to junior students, which also helps students develop leadership and mentorship skills. Monthly mentorship sessions occur throughout the duration of the program, with faculty oversight and additional educational support from teaching assistants. During these monthly sessions, students work on developing effective study skills, professionalism and time management skills.

During the first summer of the program, students participate in learning sessions that focus on population health, health care disparities, and social determinants of health to help participants develop a deeper understanding of the complex social and environmental factors that impact health outcomes. Most participants apply their knowledge and skills to community-based projects to propose solutions to health care challenges and have opportunities to present a poster of their project. During the second summer, students are exposed to a variety of health themes and problems as well as health care careers ranging from medicine to nursing to dentistry and engineering. Mentors and teaching assistants give lectures based on what they have learned during medical school, including lectures on organs systems and the basics of obtaining a patient history and conducting a physical exam. The program culminates in a final poster presentation of a research project, followed by continued mentorship on navigated college applications and readiness.

After discussing funding sources for the program and the support available to participants, Dr. Lam presented program outcomes, including testimonials from HPMP graduates. The program began in 2015, with the first class graduating in 2017. Of the students who complete the HPMP, roughly 50% pursued a major in a health care-related field, with 10-20% of each graduating class enrolling in CUNY’s combined 7-year BS/MD program.

Drs. Thesen and Manuel concluded the webinar by providing tips and sharing lessons learned for audience members considering developing pathway programs at their own institutions. Possible avenues for funding include the NSF, the NIH, private foundations, school district funding programs, alumni associations, etc., although audience members may wish to explore funding mechanisms that target specific populations. The importance of creating a welcoming environment for URiM students is vital, as programs should aim to bring students into a nurturing environment where they experience belongingness. This is also important to consider when choosing participating laboratories, mentors, and leadership teams, so that the program’s pedagogy and philosophy is properly embodied as a focus on strength and opportunity rather than a deficit mindset. Direct recruiting at high schools is also sometimes necessary to prevent gatekeeping and to encourage students personally to participate. Near-peer mentorship is also a key factor to building a supportive community, as well as team building exercises and icebreakers that involved all participants as well as community members.

References

  1. 2021 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Dec. Report No.: 21(22)-0054-EF
  2. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC.org

Schneid to Present “Academic Readiness for the Pre-clerkship Curriculum”

Sometimes you just need to add more lanes to the highway. The IAMSE Webinar Committee is excited to announce our Spring series, Widening the Road to Health Professions Education: Expanding access for diverse and underserved populations. This series will explore innovative practices in recruiting and matriculating students from underserved populations into health sciences programs and creating pathways for students to meet the unique needs of their communities. The fourth session in the series will feature Stephen Schneid of the University of California, San Diego (USA).

Stephen Shneid

Academic Readiness for the Pre-clerkship Curriculum: A closer look at the metrics in pathway students

Presenter: Stephen Schneid, PhD
Session Date & Time: March 23, 2023 at 12pm Eastern
Session Description: Postbaccalaureate premedical programs provide an important pathway for students to get into medical school. As the number and percentage of medical school matriculants participating in such programs increases, it is important to take a closer look at the metrics that are supposed to inform us about academic readiness, especially for the preclerkship curriculum and licensing exams. This session will highlight the literature on postbaccalaureate premedical programs and the relationships between preadmission metrics, such as GPA and MCAT, and academic performance.

There is still time to register yourself or your institution for the series. Is your institution already registered? Reach out to your administrative contact to get signed up for weekly updates.

As always, IAMSE Student Members can
register for the series for FREE!

Please email support@iamse.org for more details about student registration.