diagnostic problem solving, cognitive load theory, and cognitive tools – ten years of using the diagnostic pathfinder to teach clinical pathology

Jared Danielson*, Holly Bender, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010 U.S.A.

PURPOSE: Medical educators have long studied diagnostic problem solving in hopes of helping learners become better problem solvers. The Diagnostic Pathfinder is a software tool that has been used for ten years to teach this skill. This abstract reviews lessons learned from Pathfinder-based research, and ties them to current theory.

METHODS: Several studies exploring the Pathfinder’s effect on problem solving performance and student/faculty satisfaction were reviewed, as well as studies and theoretical writing involving medical diagnostic problem solving, cognitive load theory, and cognitive tools. Pathfinder characteristics are explained in light of this review.

RESULTS: The Diagnostic Pathfinder’s approach seems most likely to be effective against diagnostic errors caused by data integration problems. Studies suggest that Pathfinder use improves students’ performance on case-based problems by providing real life cases, creating a safe practice environment, providing immediate and specific feedback, enforcing sequence and completeness, and facilitating problem manipulation. The Pathfinder can be seen as a cognitive tool, and as a tool that reduces cognitive load. Cognitive tools provide processes that the mind leverages to accomplish cognitive tasks, and, over time, can be adopted by the mind as its own. Cognitive load theory suggests that effective instruction respects intrinsic cognitive load, encourages germane cognitive load, and avoids extraneous cognitive load.

CONCLUSION/FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The Pathfinder’s gating and feedback features appear to support germane cognitive load while reducing extraneous cognitive load. The Pathfinder also appears to function as a cognitive tool, leveraging processes that are used by the mind even after the tool is withdrawn.